Safe withdrawal rate in Brazil: Failure points

5
(4)

Using the Portfolio Withdrawal Calculator, for Brazil I ran some scenarios on the 4% rule over different time periods. I changed time periods and the mix of Ibovespa and Selic to see where the safe withdrawal rate in Brazil breaks down. Let’s take a look.

[This is not investing advice. Don’t make financial plans based on a blog post from some random guy on the internet.]

Starting with a base settings as follows:

Safe withdrawal rate Brazil setup

I’m assuming a R$1M portfolio and withdrawing R$40,000 per year. No pension or later income. In all scenarios I run 500 simulations using 25% Ibovespa and 75% Selic.

The results look like this:

Safe withdrawal rate Brazil

100% change of success! But as you may recall, in our last post on A new era of economic data? Pre verses Post 2007 in Brazil. we explore the possibility that the early years following the Real Plan may represent a different set of economic circumstances, which may not repeat. After 2007 the investment results look a lot different.

Lets see how the 2007-2023 time frame plays out:

Safe withdrawal rate Brazil

Not bad. 95.6% chance of success.

I have been thinking about “what happens only with more recent years?”. So I ran 2013-2023, to represent a 10 year (technically 11 year) period of only the most recent years.

Safe withdrawal rate Brazil

So the interesting observation here is we have a 100% chance of success again, by avoiding 2007-2012.

What about 5% “safe” withdrawal rate?

Same setup. All values used are the same but instead of withdrawing R$40,000 we’re withdrawing R$50,000 per year:

Safe withdrawal rate Brazil

Below you can see the results of 1995-2023 (99.6% change of success), followed by 2007-2023 (52.8% change of success), and finally 2013-2023 (75.6% change of success).

We can see 5% definitely introduces more risk of failure. We can also see 2013-2023 performs better than 2007-2023.

Charting additional “safe withdrawal rate ” scenarios

I ran some more simulations in the charts below with different levels of Ibovespa and Selic in the portfolio over different years:

Safe withdrawal rate Brazil

4% appears mostly safe, excepts in our worst timeframe when using 50% or great allocation to Ibovespa.

Safe withdrawal rate Brazil

5% is much more risky. The only times it works is with the 1995-2023 time frame and a very low stock allocation, or possibly the most recent dataset, 2013-2023 and a moderate to high stock allocation.

These scenarios assume a portfolio invested in Brazilian assets. As we saw recently, the Brazilian investor may be better off with cash in Brazil, and risk assets in the US, or broadly diversified. In my opinion I think the US market is a bit expensive at the moment but who knows what the future holds..

Are you looking for more on this topic? Check out AA40’s study Uma simulação Monte Carlo para o IBOV.

-Sirsandals

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 4

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

5 responses to “Safe withdrawal rate in Brazil: Failure points”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Cláudio Avatar
    Cláudio

    Boa abordagem. Meu número perseguido é 3,5 %. Alocação 85 % renda fixa e 15 % variável.

    1. duohwfte Avatar
      duohwfte

      3.5% looks very reasonable. I this you will do well with this approach!

      3,5% parece muito razoável. Acredito que você se sairá bem com essa abordagem!

  2. […] testar alguma outra combinação? Clique aqui e veja mais simulações que o SirSandals fez ou use o FIRE-DASH e faça as […]

  3. AA40 Avatar
    AA40

    Great study! I’ve linked your post here with the one I started on Monte Carlo for IBOV.
    Thanks a lot for this great tool. Looking forward to seeing more options as we spoke.

    1. Sirsandals Avatar
      Sirsandals

      Thanks AA40! Hope all is well.